The poor quality of security consultants

February 2002 News & Events

Much has been written, after the horror of last September's terror attacks in America, that the security industry failed the public - in this instance, the intelligence services. In the 'Last Word' section of the December 2001 issue of your Hi-Tech Security Solutions magazine your managing editor quotes almost exclusively from Jim Spencer's article, carried in the Security Technology & Design magazine published soon after the tragic events had occurred. This listed the failure of consultants, developers and manufacturers, integrators, customers, security associations, and insurance companies in providing the appropriate solutions to specific security needs.

The Managing Editors words are very apt. South African clients have been sold short by our own security professionals for many years. The main culprits being the so-called security consultants who pose as experts in the technical security field. They either do not follow the basic rules in order to produce a quality system design or much sadder they are not even aware of the fundamentals involved. There are five basic types of consultants encountered in South Africa:

* The ex-law enforcement or military types, usually good in the investigation and manpower field but lacking engineering experience; who at best recognise that they require assistance with the technical portion of the security plan and at worse attempt their own technical design with disastrous results for the client.

* The next is the consultant representing manpower or equipment firms who is a product salesman first and a consultant second with his first loyalty to the company that employs him. The end result is that the client finds he has paid for more security than he needs.

* The third type is the professional electrical engineer who provides the technical security requirements as part of his electrical brief. Over many years I have seen some very poorly compiled security enquiry documentation from this type of consultant. For example, still specifying tube cameras as part of their CCTV specification; calling for high resolution colour cameras which can obviously only be met by the monochrome type; issuing outdated specifications, or ones that have already been paid for by another client - in some instances they still contain references to the original client. However, the ultimate sin is calling for a high technical standard of equipment and then awarding the contract on a price basis for equipment which is nowhere near this requirement (that is, of a far lower specification) thus prejudicing the other tenderers who submitted prices strictly in accordance with the higher technical standards. I suspect that the consultants do not really understand what they specified in the first place.

* The fourth type is the in-house consultant. This person is normally appointed from within the company and although having the advantage of knowing the company business has no security experience. Not being prepared to inform his employer of his limitations this poor soul is easy prey for the second type of consultant (for consultant, read salesman) with all the negative ramifications.

* Lastly, there is the consultant who goes that extra mile to ensure that he understands the needs of his client so that he can design the appropriate security system to best meet these needs. Although having a general idea of the proper application of the various systems that may be used under specific conditions he also recognises that he cannot be an expert in all aspects of security manpower, procedures and hardware and thus calls on those that have the necessary skills and knowledge before compiling his security plan. One of the required fundamentals - compile a comprehensive security plan before attempting a technical design.

An important area in which the majority of consultants fall down is not preparing a detailed operational requirements document as part of their security plan (if indeed they use one). This can be considered a key document for security system designers as it states clearly what the client expects the system to be capable of doing. The development process encourages clear thinking about the what, where, when, by whom and in particular, the why in relation to the system. Without an operational requirement and matching test procedure there can be no guarantee that the system will be capable of performing its intended function. I have been involved with consultants who produce an access control design with equipment quantities and have no idea how visitors are to be processed - both at the perimeter entrance and the office reception point.

Security consultants can and do provide valuable services to their clients provided the client does a reasonably good job of selecting the right consultant in the first place. As a registered engineer who earns his living providing security technology consultancy services, I would caution prospective users of consulting services to use the same sound business judgment and standards in selecting a security consultant that they would in selecting any other type of consultant.





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Highest increase in global cyberattacks in two years
Information Security News & Events
Check Point Global Research released new data on Q2 2024 cyber-attack trends, noting a 30% global increase in Q2 2024, with Africa experiencing the highest average weekly per organisation.

Read more...
The power of PKI and private sector innovation
Access Control & Identity Management News & Events Government and Parastatal (Industry)
At the recent ID4Africa 2025 Summit in Addis Ababa, the spotlight was firmly on building secure, inclusive, and scalable digital identity ecosystems for the African continent.

Read more...
Bosch Security renamed Keenfinity
News & Events
Globally renowned brands for video systems, access control and intrusion alarm systems, as well as communication systems, unite under the roof of the new company Keenfinity Group.

Read more...
2025 video surveillance market set for improved fortunes
News & Events Surveillance
Novaira Insights has unveiled its latest report, World Market for Video Surveillance Hardware and Software – 2025 Edition, forecasting a healthy growth rate of 8,1% until 2029, excluding China.

Read more...
Wialon announces integration with fleet maintenance and optimisation platform
News & Events Transport (Industry) Logistics (Industry)
Fleet management software platform integrates with a fleet maintenance and optimisation platform to support mutual customers for better workflows and deeper insights into fleet operations.

Read more...
DeepSneak deception
Information Security News & Events
Kaspersky Global Research & Analysis researchers have discovered a new malicious campaign which is distributing a Trojan through a fake DeepSeek-R1 Large Language Model (LLM) app for PCs.

Read more...
Almost 50% of companies choose to pay the ransom
News & Events Information Security
This year’s Sophos State of Ransomware 2025 report found that nearly 50% of companies paid the ransom to get their data back, the second-highest rate of ransom payment for ransom demands in six years.

Read more...
Value and industry insight
Securex South Africa Training & Education News & Events
Securex South Africa 2025, co-located with A-OSH EXPO, Facilities Management Expo, and Firexpo, drew thousands of security professionals from across the continent and beyond, offering a platform for networking, product discovery, and knowledge sharing.

Read more...
Gallagher Security achieves ISO 27001 recertification
News & Events Training & Education
Gallagher Security has successfully achieved certification to the updated ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). This accomplishment builds on previous certifications and reflects a continued commitment to the highest standards of information security.

Read more...
Survey highlights cost of cyberdamage to industrial companies
Kaspersky Information Security News & Events
The majority of industrial organisations estimate their financial losses caused by cyberattacks to be over $1 million, while almost one in four report losses exceeding $5 million, and for some, it surpasses $10 million.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.