In what is a first of a kind ruling in the US, the Washington State Supreme Court declared recently that police may not attach a Global Positioning System tracker to a suspect's car without getting a warrant.
"Use of GPS tracking devices is a particularly intrusive method of surveillance, making it possible to acquire an enormous amount of personal information about the citizen under circumstances where the individual is unaware that every single vehicle trip taken and the duration of every single stop may be recorded by the government," Justice Barbara Madsen wrote in the unanimous decision.
A spokesperson for the Washington chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union compared the use of GPS trackers in law enforcement to "placing an invisible police officer in a person's back seat".
This is a fascinating example of the negotiation process by which a society - or in this case, the courts - adjusts to the potentials of a new technology. Whether it gets adopted or not depends on how it passes these various legal challenges.
Source: www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/news/editorial/6749034.htm
© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.