Law of evidence when dealing with CCTV video recordings

November 2003 Surveillance

The objective of this article is to educate Hi-Tech Security Solutions’ readers, equipping you with the basic necessary knowledge to ensure the admissibility as real evidence of CCTV recordings in a court of law or quasi judicial tribunal, and that the maximum probative value is attached to the recording. Without this knowledge the investment in a sophisticated recording system will be of little value as such recordings may be declared inadmissible evidence or alternatively have little probative value.

Probative material refers to anything a court may take into consideration in making a finding. Real evidence can be photographs, video and audio recordings. The Criminal Procedures Act, 51 of 1977 expressly allows for production of photographs as evidence. Video recordings, including digital recordings, are to be considered as merely a series of photographs and are therefore allowed as evidence in terms of the same section of this act.

Calibration of equipment

* Where a machine need not be calibrated, a court can take judicial notice of its accuracy or call for preliminary professional testimony that the instrument or process is generally known to be accurate or trustworthy.

* Where a machine needs to be calibrated the court will need expert evidence to prove that the particular instrument was reliable.

A camera is not an instrument that needs to be calibrated. The recorder date and time, however, needs to be set or reset, which is information supplied by human agent. The party responsible for checking or setting the time and date will have to produce additional evidence to show the correct procedure was carried out in checking or setting the time and date. This may have to be supplied in the form of an affidavit.

Printouts

Computer printouts, protocol files, etc, are real evidence. Printouts are therefore reliable in and of themselves. As such, video recordings and computer data printouts constitute very strong and direct evidence of its contents.

Authentification of computer printout

Computer printouts, which may be video or data information, must be accompanied by an affidavit authenticating such printouts. The affidavit should:

* Identify the printout and confirm that it is a computer printout as defined in the Act (Computer Evidence Act 57 of 1983).

* Confirm that it is a true copy, reproduction, transcript or interpretation of the information.

* Describe in general terms the nature, extent and sources of its data, instructions supplied to the computer and the purpose and effect of the data processed by the computer.

* Certify that the computer functioned correctly.

* Certify that no reason exists to doubt or suspect the truth or reliability of any information recorded or contained in the resultant printout.

This procedure should be followed where evidence is likely to become relevant in a trial.

Evidence obtained unconstitutionally

The test that evidence must be subjected to in order to pass the Constitutional test is:

1. Was there a personal right?

2. Was this right violated in the manner in which the evidence was obtained?

3. Would its admission render the trial unfair and/or

4. Would its admission be detrimental to the administration of justice?

The onus to prove point 1 and 2 above rest with the defense.

Ensuring admissibility

What does one need to do to ensure admissibility and maximum probative value of digital recordings and printouts of computers? Simply put, one needs to:

* Make two copies of the incident onto a stiffy or CD.

* Make sure the stiffy or CD is labelled according to the incident or case number.

* Make an affidavit as detailed in 4 above.

* Store the stiffy or CD in a sealed envelope with the operator's signature and date across any place where the envelope can be opened.

* Store these in a safe.

* One copy of the disk affidavit should be handed to the investigating officer.

* If necessary, make two video cassette recordings of the incident. Label the cassette in a similar manner to the stiffy or CD. Store these with the CD or stiffy;

* Make a copy of the original incident onto a PC workstation if this is possible.

* Do not use a stiffy, CD or cassette tape for numerous incidents. Use it only for one incident.

* Make sure that camera lenses and housing glass fronts are clean to ensure the best quality recording.

For more information contact Cliff Rose, Modular Communications, 041 364 2653, [email protected]





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Pentagon appointed as Milestone distributor
Elvey Security Technologies News & Events Surveillance
Milestone Systems appointed Pentagon Distribution (an Elvey Group company within the Hudaco Group of Companies) as a distributor. XProtect’s open architecture means no lock-in and the ability to customise the connected video solution that will accomplish the job.

Read more...
Video Analytics Selection Guide 2024
Surveillance
The Video Analytics Selection Guide 2024 highlights a number of video analytics/AI solutions companies offer to enhance and optimise video surveillance operations.

Read more...
Optimising your camera-to-operator ratio
Surveillance
Learning from critical data points in your security systems is the key to quality monitoring, effectively deploying resources, and scaling control room profitability. The golden equation is your true Camera-to-Operator ratio.

Read more...
Storage Selection Guide 2024
Storage Selection Guide Surveillance
The Storage Selection Guide 2024 includes a range of video storage and management options for small, medium and large surveillance operations.

Read more...
Directory of suppliers
Surveillance
The Directory of Suppliers and Solution Providers provides a selection of companies involved in various aspects of surveillance projects, from consulting to implementation and ongoing maintenance, as well as equipment suppliers.

Read more...
Perspectives on personal care monitoring and smart surveillance
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance Smart Home Automation IoT & Automation
Dr Craig Donald believes smart surveillance offers a range of options for monitoring loved ones, but making the right choice is not always as simple as selecting the latest technology.

Read more...
The TCO of cloud surveillance
DeepAlert Verifier Technews Publishing Surveillance Infrastructure
SMART Security Solutions asked two successful, home-grown cloud surveillance operators for their take on the benefits of cloud surveillance to the local market. Does cloud do everything, or are there areas where onsite solutions are preferable?

Read more...
Cloud or onsite, a comparison
Astrosec Surveillance
In the realm of electronic security, the choice between cloud-based and onsite software solutions for offsite CCTV monitoring can significantly impact operational efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and overall effectiveness.

Read more...
On-camera AI and storage create added benefits
Elvey Security Technologies AI & Data Analytics Surveillance IoT & Automation
The days of standalone security systems are long past, and the drive is now to educate system integrators, installers, and end users on the return on investment that can be derived from intelligent, integrated BMS, IoT and security systems.

Read more...
Surveillance on the edge
Axis Communications SA Guardian Eye Technews Publishing Surveillance
Edge processing, a practical solution that has been available for some time, has proven its utility in various scenarios, tailored to the unique requirements of each user.

Read more...