The hidden claws of proof of concept

Residential Estate Security Handbook 2019 Editor's Choice, Integrated Solutions

A proof of concept is a wonderful thing. It is the glorious end-product of months, perhaps even years, of honing an idea and its abilities to perfectly suit a market and need. It is the physical manifestation of innovation and it plays an important role in helping the organisation to fine tune issues, assess the true value of a product, determine its value to the market, and so much more. However, it can also be an expensive and time-consuming trap.


Sean Laval.

“A proof of concept (PoC) project is a great way to test new technologies and ideas, but it becomes problematic when it continues for extended periods of time without any quantifiable conclusion as to its success or failure,” says Sean Laval, executive: solutions and innovations, SqwidNet. “It can delay the commercial deployment of a viable solution within the business or for its customers. And this happens far more regularly than organisations realise.”

The pitfalls of PoC often occur when the success criteria of the project aren’t clearly defined from the outset. When the milestones, key performance indicators and benchmarks by which the PoC are measured are not adequately stipulated nor correctly managed. This can be a critical failure point for any project. Just as the employee requires ongoing measurement to ensure growth and performance, a PoC requires precise parameters within which to operate.

“The biggest challenge around the timeous completion of PoC projects is the temptation to keep on adding more to the original scope,” adds Laval. “This often happens as more possibilities become evident as the project evolves and grows. Suddenly, there are so many iterations and opportunities that they are tacked onto the original project without clear outlines or goals. To avoid this, the PoC has to remain a well-structured process.”

A successful PoC project should have a defined operational lifespan. Once this is completed, it needs to be assessed against the final metrics that were determined at the outset to establish whether or not it is worth taking further within the purchase and production lifecycle. This doesn’t mean that new insights and information won’t be uncovered throughout, or that these insights should be ignored, but rather that these fresh ideas and thoughts should be contained within a different phase of the operation.

“In fact, the new information and ideas that are unlocked throughout the course of the PoC, should be considered only after the initial results have indicated that the PoC meets minimum specifications,” says Laval. “The metric that ultimately determines the success of the PoC is whether or not the solution adds value to the business and this can only be understood objectively if the metrics are agreed upon early in the engagement. They should ideally be agreed upon by both the business and the solutions vendor at the beginning of the process to avoid any complications later on.”

To deliver relevant results, the business entering into the PoC needs to understand exactly what information is valuable. This can relate to increased return on investment (ROI), greater operational efficiencies, faster go-to-market capabilities, or improved customer satisfaction. Often, solution providers will promise an array of benefits to the business, across multiple spheres, and equally often, many of these may not be feasible.

The best approach to any PoC is a realistic one that isolates a few key pain points that need to be addressed during the PoC period. This tends to lead to simpler metrics that allow for more valuable evaluation and improved long-term success.

“It is critical to involve all the stakeholders in the business to ensure the problem is correctly defined and understood across multiple levels of the organisation,” says Laval. “By the same token, PoC success is dependent on the reputation and capabilities of the service providers and consultants that the organisation works with.”

Before embarking on a PoC, check the credentials of partner organisations, reference their case studies that describe similar deployments, and ensure you have a clear picture of their capabilities. This will help to identify possible complications early on in the process and mitigate preventable issues.

“A business should consider a PoC project wherever there is a problem that requires an innovative solution, but should always ensure completion is timeous, partners well-vetted, and parameters extensively measured,” concludes Laval.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

What is your ‘real’ security posture?
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Many businesses operate under the illusion that their security controls, policies, and incident response plans will hold firm when tested by cybercriminals, but does this mean you are really safe?

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture? (Part 2)
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure
In the second part of this series of articles from BlueVision, we explore the human element: social engineering and insider threats and how red teaming can expose and remedy them.

Read more...
IQ and AI
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance AI & Data Analytics
Following his presentation at the Estate Security Conference in October, Craig Donald delves into the challenge of balancing human operator ‘IQ’ and AI system detection within CCTV control rooms.

Read more...
Onsite AI avoids cloud challenges
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Most AI programs today depend on constant cloud connections, which can be a liability for companies operating in secure or high-risk environments. That reliance exposes sensitive data to external networks, but also creates a single point of failure if connectivity drops.

Read more...
Toxic combinations
Editor's Choice
According to Panaseer’s latest research, 70% of major breaches are caused by toxic combinations: overlapping risks that compound and amplify each other, forming a critical vulnerability to be exploited.

Read more...
Continuum launches centralised access and identity management
Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Integrated Solutions Facilities & Building Management
Continuum Identity is a newly launched company in the identity management and access control sector, targeting the complexity of managing various Access and Identity Management (AIM) systems.

Read more...
ArxTech: Over 30 years of evolving security solutions for South Africa’s toughest challenges
Security Services & Risk Management Integrated Solutions
[Sponsored] For over 30 years, a Centurion-based company has helped shape how security technology is designed, deployed, and supported in South Africa. Originally known as CellSecure, it now operates as ArxTech.

Read more...
Cape Town estates gain access to advanced security technology at Securex
Securex South Africa News & Events Integrated Solutions
For the first time, estate and complex security decision-makers in the Western Cape will have direct access to the breadth of solutions and expertise these shows are synonymous with.

Read more...
Making drone security more accessible
Editor's Choice Integrated Solutions Residential Estate (Industry) AI & Data Analytics IoT & Automation
Michael Lever discusses advances in drone technology, focusing on cost reductions and the implementation of automated services, including beyond line of sight capabilities, for residential estates with SMART Security Solutions.

Read more...
Private fire services becoming the norm?
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Editor's Choice
As the infrastructure and service delivery in many of South Africa’s major cities decline, with a few, limited exceptions, more of the work that should be done by the state has fallen to private companies.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.