Application security

November 2012 Information Security

Despite an array of security tools at their disposal, companies are still under cyber attack and, if one looks at the number of known successful attacks on business data and finances, it seems that the criminals are winning. Of course, in South Africa most of these breaches are not publicised because there is no requirement on the part of the company to acknowledge successful intrusions. This may change in the near future, but the reality is that publicising attacks is not the solution.

Some say that the embarrassment factor once a breach is public will force companies to tighten their digital perimeters as a risk mitigation measure. But then, what do they do about the internal threats from employees who see a vulnerability and decide to ‘borrow’ some company money to fund their weekend trip to the casino or support their neighbourhood syndicate? Most people in the know will tell you that the prevalence of internal fraud is far higher than external attacks.

The latest South African Cyber Threat Barometer for 2012/13 estimates that R2,65 billion was lost to cyber crime in the period from January 2011 to August 2012, with just over R660 million that was not recovered. To download the barometer for free, please go to www.securitysa.com/*cyberthreat-za (this is a shortened link that will take you to http://www.wolfpackrisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/SA%202012%20Cyber%20Threat%20Barometer_Hi_res.pdf).

At the recent CA Symposium in Johannesburg, Hi-Tech Security Solutions spoke to Ed Medcalf, regional commercial manager, CA Technologies, about the latest in application security.

Ed Medcalf
Ed Medcalf

While we all enjoy the technology available today that allows us to access the corporate network and applications from anywhere, using almost any device, the convenience is offset by a reduction in security because the perimeter of the business is now everywhere. If, for example, you log into an application while at the airport and someone watches you type in your password, if that password is your only defence, the watcher can now access whatever you can. Similarly, if you have malware on your mobile device courtesy of a funky app you downloaded, your personal details as well as your access credentials to corporate digital assets are also compromised.

Instead of monitoring data streams and stored data for known malware strings, as most antivirus applications do, Medcalf suggests it is time to monitor the context of application access rather than only the data. Add to this the context of the user’s behaviour and the business has a good chance of stopping both internal and external shenanigans.

It is important to remember that a valid user will not need malware to access corporate systems as they are allowed, or even supposed to be there. However, if you know the user’s normal behaviour, such as what applications he uses, what authority he has and where he accesses the system from, you can adjust the security protocols to grant access while remaining secure.

Medcalf gives the example of a CFO accessing sensitive data. If the CFO is authenticated and logs on from his office PC, continues with his normal behaviour at the times he usually does his work, he can be granted access transparently. If however, he logs in at midnight from an unknown device, the system can automatically insist on more security to ensure the access is legitimate, or even deny access because it is too risky.

If you are already monitoring the data going through applications, this added layer of security will not add any latency or slow the user at all. Medcalf adds that CA works with customers to set policies to implement this type of application security, looking at variables that make sense to the company, such as the number of times a user requests access, the value of transactions he normally handles, and whether he crosses boundaries like financial ceilings and so forth.

Naturally, application security based on behaviour is only one tool in the arsenal of protection companies need to take to secure their digital assets and bank accounts from internal and external threats.

The security process starts with authenticating users and making sure they have access to what they need to do their jobs. It also includes taking the time to create workable policies that set behavioural limits, such as how much money an individual can authorise for payment and who needs to verify the final payment etc.

It also means controlling access via mobile devices. If the CEO above accesses the network via his Galaxy Tablet and the company knows this device is his and has the relevant security installed, access is granted. If however, it is an unknown device, access can be denied or limited.

In the good old days, digital security was an application you could install and basically forget. Today it has become a craft that requires cooperation across different disciplines within the company, focused on developing a constantly evolving solution.



Credit(s)




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

From the Editor's desk: Security goes mainstream
Technews Publishing News & Events
      Welcome to SMART Security’s SMART Mining & Industrial Security Handbook 2026. While the world is focused on cybersecurity and AI, physical security has become a board-level concern across South Africa’s ...

Read more...
Industry perspective on industrial cybersecurity
Technews Publishing News & Events Infrastructure Industrial (Industry)
The Industrial Security Harmonization Group has released a joint industry perspective highlighting a critical truth in industrial cybersecurity: secure communication is not determined by protocols alone, but by how they are deployed and managed in real-world environments.

Read more...
You will not get your files back with VECT
Information Security
If the newbie to the ransomware scene, VECT, comes knocking at your organisation’s door, do not pay the ransom! The decryption keys simply do not exist. They were discarded at the moment of encryption by the malware itself.

Read more...
Industrial sector is a primary cyber target
Information Security
Threats in industrial environments are distributed with striking uniformity: APT-driven incidents constitute 17,8%, malware 14,9% and social engineering 13,9%. This pattern suggests that industrial organisations attract a broad range of adversaries with different capabilities and objectives.

Read more...
The control room problem that nobody wants to talk about
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice
WhatsApp has become the unofficial backbone of security communications across the mining and industrial sectors, but it was never designed to be a security tool.

Read more...
Controlling access for people and vehicles
IDEMIA STid Security Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Asset Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
When it comes to access control, the security requirements of mines and the industrial sector are similar, requiring a layered approach that combines physical barriers, digital authentication, and continuous monitoring to protect personnel, assets, and operational continuity.

Read more...
Claude Mythos wake-up call
Technews Publishing AI & Data Analytics Information Security
AI has crossed a critical cybersecurity threshold and frontier models are accelerating attack lifecycles and will enable attackers to identify and exploit vulnerabilities at scale and speed, through novel methods that were previously the domain of advanced nation-state entities.

Read more...
If you cannot prove identity, you cannot claim security
Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Cybersecurity planning for 2026 is a structural change in how attacks are executed and how trust is exploited, demanding that companies stop layering tools on top of infrastructure and instead prioritise intelligence and identity.

Read more...
95% do not have full trust in cybersecurity vendors
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Trust in cybersecurity vendors is fragile, difficult to measure, and increasingly shaping risk posture at both operational and board levels. Lack of verifiable transparency undermines cybersecurity decision-making, according to Sophos-backed research.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: When the rules change
Technews Publishing News & Events
         Welcome to the SMART Surveillance & AI Handbook 2026. We were a bit nervous about including AI in the title, since it either has a good or bad reputation depending on the individual – very few people ...

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.