The pressing issue of effective cybersecurity measures weighs heavily on businesses in today’s digital world. Companies are compelled to comply with legislative mandates and, more importantly, to implement appropriate security measures for both their customers and their own most valuable asset – their data. Business reputations and sustainability lie at the heart of these considerations - organisations must meet the challenges of enhancing the efficiency of security measures, while at the same time keeping costs down. It is a tall order.
Penetration testing has, for a long time, been one of the strategic methods that organisations have used to determine their security standing. However, with new technologies being developed and introduced onto the market, Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) has been identified as the recommended strategy. By implementing BAS in security approaches, organisations can reduce expenses that are normally incurred in penetration testing and at the same time improve their security stance.
BAS is one of the newer concepts that is gaining popularity in the cybersecurity market. It is essentially a set of tools that launch base attacks which are realistic, and take place on a 24/7 basis. They test an organisation’s defences against known threats, misconfigurations, and vulnerabilities, providing meaningful information that does not interfere with business processes. One of the differences between penetration testing and BAS is that it is done at specific intervals, with the latter providing a constant view of a company’s security posture, making it easier to identify and address issues.
In this aspect, BAS minimises the costs of penetration testing:
Continuous security validation: With BAS up and running all the time, it is possible to constantly identify and fix system problems. This proactive approach helps reduce the number of full-scale penetration tests that are conducted at regular intervals since most of the common problems are fixed in real time.
Streamlined pen testing efforts: In a nutshell, BAS takes care of the daily vulnerability assessments, whereas penetration tests are more effective and directed to the most important and complicated sections of the network. This approach helps to reduce the extent of traditional penetration testing and thus decreases time and costs.
Cost savings through automation: Penetration testing is challenging in that it demands extensive time input as well as specialised skills – this last comes with a high price tag. Some of the tasks usually carried out during penetration tests are also performed by BAS, which means that many of them are automated, enabling organisations to get similar results, while doing it faster. In the long run, BAS automation helps to reduce the costs of frequent penetration testing services.
Faster remediation and validation: Another advantage is that BAS helps verify whether vulnerabilities have been effectively dealt with once identified. This means there is no need for another penetration test to check on the fixes made. This, in turn, decreases the cost and time needed for the penetration test and guarantees that security is always enhanced.
Year-round protection: BAS ensures that a strong and effective security posture is maintained throughout the year, not just during penetration testing cycles. This way, when major vulnerabilities are dealt with during continuous testing, there are no serious findings during the periodic penetration tests. This approach saves on time as well as the cost of remediation and re-assessments.
The perfect partnership
BAS should not be viewed as a replacement for penetration testing, but rather an extension of it. Penetration testing is still very useful in identifying more complex risks and assessing the effectiveness of challenges created by human beings. BAS, however, is better at offering real-time, automatic analysis that does not allow risks to accrue.
This partnership enables the businesses to maximise returns on their security investment. BAS takes care of the day-to-day checkups and makes sure there is no threat at all, while penetration testing focuses on identifying high-risk areas. Altogether, they provide a structured approach to security that is both comprehensive and economical.
Conclusion
It’s wise to integrate BAS into your security strategy if you are a company wishing to strengthen its defences and, at the same time, cut costs.
Businesses leveraging automated solutions - such as BAS - for continuous security validation, while reserving penetration testing for targeted, high-risk scenarios, can reduce costs significantly, while maintaining a robust security posture. This approach guarantees proactive defence without compromising the quality of protection.
BAS is not only a new tool in the security arsenal, but an important step towards greater efficiency and robustness for businesses wanting to remain relevant in a dynamic threat environment. This is where BAS and penetration testing align; both solutions help to strengthen security posture, while guaranteeing that every Rand you spend on security is well spent.
© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.
printer friendly version